Invincible #6
Invincible
#6 (I#6): My story tells how Mark
goes off to tour a college and tries to impede a skull-faced creature in a
power suit. Robot of the Teen Team is
trying out for the Guardians of the Globe and disbands the Teen Team. Mark’s parents have sex. Mark’s friend discovers his secret Invincible
identity.
Low-Frequency
Listener (L-FL): Would it be
fair to add this element to the superhero definitions: secret identities are
more fragile than Fabergé eggs and are just as easily cracked?
(I#6): Yes, that definition works. The breaking of Fabergé eggs reminds me of Geoff
Klockw, a professor at the Borough of Manhattan Community College (the name
sake for Matt Fraction’s villain Dokkktor Klockhammer). In his piece “What Is a Superhero? No One Knows—That’s What Makes ‘em Great,” Klockw
writes that “I think a good definition of ‘superhero’ would actually obscure why superheroes matter. The consequences of the impossibility of
defining “superhero” are too juicy to give up, and are at the very center of
the greatness of the superhero. If you
can’t say what a superhero is, then you can’t say what characteristics do not
belong in any given story….
“It is my claim that superhero comics do not have clear
definitions, and it is my claim that we, as comic book academics, should keep
it that way, so that we will continue to accept the kinds of stories, in all
their strangeness, summarized by Comics
Alliance. Lunacy is truly what makes
superhero comics great.”
Would lunacy recede with more comic book academics? No. No. No. No. No.
No comments:
Post a Comment